What do the ‘Dem-Cons’ government do when they need approval from a representative Muslim body?
Easy, they create the Muslim Leadership Council, handpicking who gets to be on the body itself.
Paul Goodman over at CONservative home seems to think every single Muslim involved in the scheme is a closet Islamist.
The interesting fight of course is between the Conservative heavyweights (in every sense of the word).
In one corner we have Eric ‘chicken tikka masala’ Pickles
In the other corner we have Saeeda ‘every muslim apart from me is an extremist kaffir’ Warsi
What they are wrestling for (disgusting image if you think about it) is the soul of the Conservative right wing.
Muslims, like always, are smack bang in the middle of it all.
Last year, An All Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia was formed, the secretariat of which was ENGAGE.
Zionist MP’s from across the board were spurred into action by their masters to remove Engage from their position as secretariat to the APPG on Islamophobia, and as ever, they succeeded in doing so.
Now you know the background, you’ll be able to follow my logic.
The government and it’s zionist cadre, always need a Muslim partner to act as a yes man and rubber stamp it’s actions.
Ostensibly this was the MCB (Muslim Council of Britain’s) job for many years, until Daud Abdullah decided he could no longer tolerate British political support for Israel after 2010’s ‘Cast Lead’ attack on Gaza.
He was savagedly attacked in the media for saying what the majority of the muslims in the UK think.
Since then, the MCB & MINAB and a whole bunch of Muslim Acronym groups have been given the cold shoulder.
Other government created fronts like the The Sufi Muslim Council were brilliantly exposed.
So it left the government and it’s zionist sponsored schemes for Muslims in disarray, without a Muslim yes man, how can we play our RAND created moderate V extremist, divide and rule policy?
Step up the Muslim Leadership Council.
It’s very important to understand how good the system is at co-opting dissenting voices and that most discussions within the media are often the first step for the issue to be reabsorbed into ‘the system’, investigated or committee’d to death & out of consciousness.
As I was ready to publish this, news got to me that the APPG on Islamophobia, as written about above, had been relaunched within Westminster.
Dr. Chris Allen (The Key Trends Of Islamophobia & Anti-Muslim Hate Crime) is someone who’s work I recognise in fighting Islamophobia and helping shaping policy to eradicate it.
However, even Dr. Allen wasn’t immune to being co-opted into the system, when his “Independent report to the All Party Parliamentary Group on Islamophobia” was inadvertently used to remove Engage from it’s role as secretary.
As it was put to Dr. Allen, you can write intellectually impressive analyses of the subtle nuances of the meaning contained in the term Islamophobia, but when it comes to making basic political judgements in response to the actual operation of anti-Muslim bigotry in the real world, you clearly don’t have a fucking clue.
The relaunch of the group now has Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour) as co-chair.
For anyone who doesn’t know about Khalid Mahmood, he’s an absolute waste of space career politician. He’s never raised the issue of Islamophobia, he voted for the Iraq war, he’s refused to condemn Israel on several occasions and to show what a great Muslim he is, he had an affair with Elaina Cohen and claimed the hotel he used for his sleazy rendezvous on his expenses….so he isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed either.
By appointing someone like Khalid Mahmood, the system has the element of control it requires and will use the token Muslim face to once again act as gate keeper and block any dissenting opinion from the Muslim community, one that Khalid Mahmood has been doing successfully in Birmingham for many a year, and one he will get to replicate at the highest level possible.
No Muslim political group or lobby (and by political I mean in the sense of defending the rights of Muslims in the UK and worldwide, yes chaps it’s foreign policy) can be created by the government.
This political group can only be created and funded by almost 3 million Muslims in the UK.
The vision, aims, strategy and tactics have to be developed by us.
The ownership has to be ours.
Sadly we hear of the 99% and the 1% all too often.
Of the 3 million Muslims in the UK, I’d say that not even 1% are defending the Muslims and the Ummah – getting politically active – to change the betterment of mankind.
Government created means government owned.
Stop funding the building of new glass chandeliers and marble floors in your Masajid, it is not a priority.
Creating the 800lb gorilla that fights politically for the rights of Muslims in the UK, (ultimately the actions taken by the politicians in the UK that effect Muslims the world over) HAS to become our number one priority.
Are you with me?