Category Archives: Obama

Obama & more of the same ol’ shit

Yesterday, tens of millions of idiots went out and voted, thinking it will bring a change to their economic condition.

Nothing changes in the shit chain, the end product will remain the same.

Question is how long will you tolerate eating it?

It’s only funny because it’s true, right?

Leave a comment

Filed under Obama

The Bullshit Iranian assassination plot against the Saudi ambassador

The bullshit Iranian assassination plot against the Saudi ambassador, a plot created by the Israeli’s to be executed by (US created) narco traffickers in Washington, with hundreds of dead freedom loving american patriots as collateral damage.

Can you smell the manure?

Being the sucker for punishment that I am, I’ve just finished watching newsnight where the BBC propaganda team allowed some pretty ludicrous claims by James Rubin (zionist) & an American stooge Iranian dissident to lay the groundwork as to why America and every single country in the world should go and bomb the shit out of Iran.

Lets be real the zionists are masters at getting goy to kill goy – so lets get the Americans who are butt buddies with the Saudi’s & every single other repressive, totalitarian regime in the Middle East to go kill the evil Iranians.

Hell, the Sunni ruled Arab Middle East wouldn’t have a problem with killing a million Muslim Shia, the rulers, not the people of course.

You can imagine the Saud king’s media right now looping the cleverly crafted speeches & evidence from the americans to kill Adel al-Jubeir, the saudi ambassador.

Right now I can’t believe that there’s no scepticism being expressed in the media. All the sheep are dancing to the same marching drum.

Remember the smoking guns that acted as triggers before for illegal invasions?

Yellow cake, aluminium tubes, 45 minutes…..WMD’s

So let’s just get this clear, of all the places in the world where Iran could kill a Saudi diplomat, it would choose Washington, DC, obviously. A place which is a nice cushy target, where there’s no security and one can just fly in and do a nice clean wet job.

Instead the fiendishly clever Iranian revolutionary guards (a bit like the oh so feared & nightmare inducing revolutionary guards of Saddam Hussein…that didn’t exist) they took a leaf out of the yankee handbook and outsourced it to a couple of local Iranian-Americans Manssor Arbabsiar and Gholam Shakuri and told them to get on with it.

Because when you need such a job done, that’s what you do, lurk around telephone booths calling the cards that have been left in there, hoping you might just get the bloody A Team to do the job for you.

So this gun for hire goes to Mexico and links up with a Mexican narco trafficker and asks him for an assassin, because they’ve got plenty of them lying around, who can sneak across the border and do the hit.

Then again, if I wanted Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi ambassador dead, I would have poisoned the ferrero rocher at his reception, no, stop, ambassador you’re really spoiling us…. or failing that, knowing how the Saud’s love themselves some young filipino & bangladeshi boys I’m sure a “sex game gone wrong” type of set up could have been put in motion.

If your intelligence has not been insulted, then you really are a dumb piece of shit.

Leave your contact details below as I have some magic beans that I want to sell you.

It’s ridiculous and this entire absurd scenario has to be dismissed for the lunacy that it is.

Are they really assuming that the public and the world is that dumb?

The bigger the lie, the more they believe.

Go read my lengthy posts on “creating the terror threat” to help you understand how the entire game is played.

This scheme is no more crazier than the ones dreamt up by the FBI.

A typical infiltration scheme works like this.

They will plant someone in a mosque and that individual will find and groom the most dissatisfied & crazy attendee of the masajid (not hard to do, I’m perfectly qualified for this role, get in touch shit heads, seriously, what you are waiting for?) and then offer him a terrorist scheme to kill the kuffar and get into heaven quick. Which is why the FBI have been found to organize almost all the known terror plots in the US.

When the patsy agrees to do it – The Portland Christmas Tree Bomber – How The FBI Created, Trained & Supplied “An Islamic Terrorist” – you’ll get a press conference with all the bells and whistles, announcing to the world how america’s finest have just averted the worlds biggest terrorist plot.

If you can’t smell a big, fat, lying dirty zionist rat behind this scheme to force the saudi’s or america to fight a war on it’s behalf, then there is no hope for you. Go stick your head in the oven now.

Oh and it’s coming up to re-election time for Obama, America loves a war president, and the rapist, murderer in charge of shit is desperate to be re-elected.

Get it yet?

13 Comments

Filed under 4GW, Creating The Terror Threat, Foreign Policy, Iran, Manufacturing Consent, Middle East, Military Industrial Complex, Obama, Terrorism, Western Hypocrisy

Afghanistan – A War Without End, Inventing Enemies to Buy Bombs

With Obama’s declaration that “Combat Activities” will cease in Afghanistan & 33,000 US troops will be leaving it’s yet again time to separate the media propaganda from the truth.

Last night’s BBC documentary “Afghanistan – War Without End?” showed many a half truth in discussing the “Great Game V.2.0″. Then again, what can we really expect from John Ware, one of the pro israeli journalists embedded within the BBC.

Already Obama is under pressure from the military industrial complex to keep the troop numbers high. Despite Obama’s approval ratings riding high after the “deading” of Osama Bin Laden, what are the real chances of him still being President in 2013? seeing US presidential elections are due next year. This of course comes from a man who said Guantanamo would be closed as part of his election campaign – four years later, we’re still waiting.

The entire premise of foreign troops, especially American troops leaving a country they have invaded is an entirely false one. The media maybe reporting it as that, but what’s being said is that “Combat Operations” will cease. Just like combat operations ended in Iraq years ago, hasn’t led to a drawdown of troop numbers, Afghanistan will be precisely the same. No one builds the world’s largest “embassy” compound to leave it behind. The Second World War ended in 1945, yet American bases remain in the countries they invaded, principally Germany & Japan.

Listening to Radio 4′s Today Show this morning was far more revelatory than a whole hour’s worth of BBC programming.

Simply listen to what Michael Semple, former Deputy to the EU Special Representative for Afghanistan and a key proponent of talking to the Taliban had to say on the subject:

I’ve lost count the amount of times I’ve had to explain to people that western military theory is based primarily on Carl von Clausewitz’s teachings, what is taught in every single military academy is;

“War is not merely a political act, but also a political instrument, a continuation of political relations, a carrying out of the same by other means”

War is a conduit to achieve a political objective, if you have no political objective to achieve, or the remit is changed regularly as has been the case in Afghanistan, then you are in a perpetual state of war, a never ending war, that has no end game in sight.

While negotiating a settlement with the Taliban is probably the only option left to “The West”, it’s a bit hard to be taken seriously if you are talking peace, yet continue to kill the people you want to bring to the negotiating table.

The Afghan War Logs showed the true nature of the Afghan War, one that the media doesn’t report on.

As Simon Jenkins, writing in The Guardian pointed out recently, it is not democracy that keeps western nations at war, but armies and the interests now massed behind them. Eisenhower’s farewell message to America was a simple warning against the “disastrous rise of misplaced power” of a military-industrial complex with “unwarranted influence on government”.

A burgeoning defence establishment, backed by large corporate interests, would one day employ so many people as to corrupt the political system. (His original draft even referred to a “military-industrial-congressional complex”.) This lobby, said Eisenhower, could become so huge as to “endanger our liberties and democratic processes”.

I wonder what Eisenhower would make of today’s US, with a military grown from 3.5 million people to 5 million. The western nations face less of a threat to their integrity and security than ever in history, yet their defence industries cry for ever more money and ever more things to do. The cold war strategist, George Kennan, wrote prophetically: “Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial complex would have to remain, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented.”

The war on terror fulfilled all Eisenhower’s fears, as America sank into a swamp of kidnapping, torture and imprisonment without trial.

The belligerent posture of the US and Britain towards the Muslim world has fostered antagonism and moderate threats in response. The bombing of extremist targets in Pakistan is an invitation for terrorists to attack us, and then a need for defence against such attack. A self fulfilling perpetual cycle of violence.

Meanwhile, the opportunity cost of appeasing the complex is astronomical.

Eisenhower remarked that “every gun that is made is a theft from those who hunger” – a bomber is two power stations and a hospital not built. Likewise, each Tomahawk Cameron drops on Tripoli destroys not just a Gaddafi bunker (are there any left?), but a hospital ward and a classroom in Britain.

As long as bullets are fired in war, there will be a company profiting from their sale, with the invention of the global war against terrorism, it provides a blank cheque opportunity for the defence industry – the military industrial complex – the scenery maybe variable – Iraq or Afghanistan – the money source remains the constant and the end result remains constant.

Muslims die.

1 Comment

Filed under 4GW, Afghanistan, Creating The Terror Threat, Documentary, Foreign Policy, Manufacturing Consent, Media Highlight of the Week, Military Industrial Complex, Obama, War

Obama – Didn’t You Promise To Shut Down Guantanamo?

The President for change who was going to close the concentration camp in Guantanamo has done a complete U-turn by not only failing to close the death camp within 12 months but has now reinstated “Military Trials”.

The logic of course is that these men held for almost ten years, with no charge are too dangerous to free or impossible to convict due to evidence obtained through torture. The Americans refuse to try them in civilian courts where the burden of proof required is far lower than in a military kangaroo court.

You would have thought that prosecuting Osama Bin Laden’s personal bodyguard for close to a decade would have been an open and shut case. Despite all the hype, American military courts could not prosecute Abu Jandal and today he is a free man.

In a similar case, Salim Hamdan spent seven years in Guantanamo, he was freed after no charges were forthcoming. Instead of being the dangerous terrorist the Bush administration made him to be, he was found to be a low-level aide and freed.

But for every man who wins his freedom, another man will die of “natural causes”, Awal Gul, 48, was accused of being a Taliban commander and part of the al-Qaeda network. He had been held without charges since October 2002.

Then there’s the case of Saber Lahmer, one of six men kidnapped by US agents in Sarajevo and taken to Guantanamo. After being held without charge for over eight years they were acquitted of all terrorism related charges.

Guantanamo’s role has been far removed from making the world a safer place by keeping dangerous terrorists locked up, instead it acts as a focal point of an unjust foreign policy, that acts as a rallying call for those who despise the hypocrisy in America’s actions.

The White House may well say that it has made the system fairer, but it’s simply a return to square one.

America knows better.

Like Johnny Cochran said during the OJ Simpson murder trial, “If the glove does not fit…you must acquit”

The Akh urges Obama to stop being a hypocrite, try these men in a civilian court, you cannot hold anyone without charge indefinitely.

3 Comments

Filed under Creating The Terror Threat, Foreign Policy, Obama, War Crimes, Western Hypocrisy

Sarah Palin & The Right Wing Republican Tea Party Are Responsible For Gabrielle Giffords Shooting & Much Of America’s Hateful, Bigoted Vitriol

Arizona sheriff Clarence Dupnik says the growing hate and intolerance in American politics is to blame for the shooting of democratic Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford and several others.

The assassination attempt on Giffords followed a widely-covered post by Palin on her political action committee’s page, Sarahpac.com, which showed gunsight targets on each one of the states Palin considered a “problem.” The site listed Congress members by name, including Giffords.

Palin also recently Tweeted prior to Giffords’ shooting, one of her catch phrases: “Don’t retreat – reload.”

The man who had most to do with the shooter, Loughner after his arrest, Pima County Sheriff Clarence W. Dupnik, was clearly angered by what he heard from the assassin:

“When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry … it is getting to be outrageous. And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become sort of the capital. We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry.”

The Akh is waiting for all white Americans to apologise for this act of terrorism.

1 Comment

Filed under Current Affairs, Obama, Racism, Rise of the Far Right, Western Hypocrisy

Republican Leader Eric Cantor Pledges Allegiance to Israel Over America

House majority leader Eric Cantor (Republican) is desperately trying to explain away the promise he made to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu that he would side, as a policy, with Israel against the President of the United States of America.

Cantor huddled with Netanyahu just prior to the Prime Minister’s meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Clinton was expected to reaffirm the American commitment to Israeli-Palestinian negotiations and opposition to Israeli settlement expansion.

But Cantor wanted Netanyahu to know that he had his back.

Cantor’s office itself put out a statement bragging about his pledge to Netanyahu:

“Eric stressed that the new Republican majority will serve as a check on the Administration and what has been, up until this point, one party rule in Washington….He made clear that the Republican majority understands the special relationship between Israel and the United States, and that the security of each nation is reliant upon the other.”

For now, forget Cantor’s ridiculous assertion that the security of Israel and the United States are “reliant upon the other.”

No, the United States provides Israel with the security assistance to survive – it is not the other way around.

But lay that aside.

It is Cantor’s statement of loyalty to Netanyahu that is the shocker.

Specifically, it is his promise that he would ensure that Republicans in the US House of Representatives “will serve as a check” on US Middle East policy.

Almost immediately, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency’s bureau chief in Washington, Ron Kampeas, declared that Cantor’s statement was “extraordinary”.

He wrote that he could not

“remember an opposition leader telling a foreign leader, in a personal meeting, that he would side, as a policy, with that leader against the President.”

Kampeas was clearly shocked, but he was understating the enormity of Cantor’s offense.

Cantor’s pledge of allegiance to a foreign leader would be remarkable, and deeply offensive, even if the foreign country in question were Canada or the United Kingdom, our two closest allies with whom we have few policy differences.

The United States has major policy differences with Israel, and has had them for decades, most notably over settlements, the occupied West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, etc.

Israel is also the largest recipient of US foreign aid in the world, which means that the President of the United States has every right to express those differences firmly and clearly.

On the other hand, no American official – by any stretch of the imagination – has the right to tell the government of Israel, or any foreign government, that he stands with the foreign leader against his own president.

It is one thing to oppose particular US policies; it is quite another to tell a foreign leader, “I’m with you, not my president.” Of course, Cantor was just being honest.

Although he does oppose virtually all of President Obama’s policies – he’s a Republican and that is what Republicans do – he supports 100 per cent of Israel’s policies.

And although an extreme partisan domestically, when it comes to Israel, he supports whichever government is in power.

He believes in the right to criticise this government, just not that one.

Cantor’s mistake was not telling Prime Minister Netanyahu what everyone knows is true anyway, but telling the world what he said.

This is the classic Washington definition of a gaffe (i.e., inadvertently speaking an inconvenient truth).

In this case, the gaffe produced a firestorm.

And this is where I consider the possibility that Cantor simply doesn’t understand what he’s doing.

After all, he has been an American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) cutout since he first was elected to office.

He’s been to more AIPAC meetings than he can probably count.

And he should have figured out by now that the lobby is extremely careful, obsessively careful, to always empathise loyalty to the United States while simultaneously endorsing Israeli policies that undermine our foreign policy objectives.

AIPAC officials never, ever, say that when push comes to shove their loyalty is with Israel not the United States. In fact, the accusation that this is the case is the charge AIPAC hates most.

But the soon-to-be Majority Leader came right out and said it: Israel, right or wrong.

It took a few days for Cantor to understand how utterly offensive his statement was. He might have heard from a few Tea Party types who, say what you will about them, tend to take their patriotism seriously.

So Cantor explained that he was misunderstood. His inconvenient truth, his gaffe, was replaced by a laughable untruth.

MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Action Network. The above article first appeared in Foreign Policy Matters, a part of the Media Matters Action Network.

4 Comments

Filed under Israel, Obama, Western Hypocrisy, Zionism

9/11 Conspirator Ahmed Ghailani Found Guilty On Just ONE Out of 285 Terror Charges

Ahmed Ghailani is the first detainee from the concentration camp of Guantanamo Bay to be tried in a US civilian court. He was been found guilty on just ONE out of 285 terror charges over the 1998 bombings of US embassies in Africa.

According to CBS News, the anonymous federal jury deliberated over seven days, with a juror writing a note to the judge saying she felt threatened by other jurors.

Ahmed Ghailani still faces a minimum of 20 years in prison and a potential life sentence for his role in the embassy bombings.

The verdict can fairly be characterized as a surprise and a disappointment for the government, which barely secured a conviction, as the trial had been viewed as a possible test case for President Obama administration’s aim of putting other terror detainees on trial in U.S. courts.

Ghailani’s prosecution also demonstrated some of the “constitutional challenges” the government would face if that happens. On the eve of his trial last month, the judge barred the government from calling a key witness because the witness had been identified while Ghailani was being held at a secret CIA camp where “harsh interrogation techniques” (torture) were used.

American prosecutors still don’t seem to get the concept of justice, but are still fixated upon vengeance, as the clip above shows.

The Akh wonders how the trial of self-professed September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed still in Guantanamo Bay would play out now?

Can any of the people held in Guantanamo Bay ever get a fair trial?

Is it acceptable for them to be locked up and tortured for almost 10 years with no charges or any semblance of a trial?

Wasn’t one of Obama’s election pledges to close down Guantanamo Bay?

Seems we all have more questions than there are answers.

1 Comment

Filed under Obama, Terrorism, Western Hypocrisy