Do Not Allow War Criminal Tony Blair To Become EU President

Tony Blair should be sent to Europe, to face a war crime tribunal in The Hague, not as the new President of the EU.

For some time now, increasingly insistent news reports have made evident a wish, in some quarters, to see Tony Blair appointed the first President of the European Council.

In violation of international law, Tony Blair committed this country to a war in Iraq that a large majority of European citizens opposed. This war has claimed over a million victims and displaced millions of refugees. It has been a major factor in today’s profound destabilisation of the Middle East, and has weakened world security. In order to lead his country into war, Mr Blair made systematic use of fabricated evidence and the manipulation of information.

The steps taken by Tony Blair’s government, and his complicity with the Bush administration in the illegal programme of “extraordinary renditions”, have led to an unprecedented decline in civil liberties.

Sign the petition here, stop Blair the butcher of Baghdad from being made the EU President.

“300,000 Muslims Will Die, They Will Disappear From The Face of This Earth”

The words of former Chetnik leader Radovan Karadzic rang out as the butcher of Srebrenica bizarrely boycotted his own trial for war crimes at the Hague.

“Big Media” have yet again failed in reporting what has been said in the trial, instead, The Akh had to go to The Australian News to get the heads up.

“They have to know that there are 20,000 armed Serbs around Sarajevo … it will be a black cauldron where 300,000 Muslims will die, They will disappear. That people will disappear from the face of the earth.”

“No Muslim foundations shall ever be laid in Serb areas and Serbian villages, All foundations that are laid will be blown up. You must not sell land to the Muslims … this is a fight to the finish. It is a battle for living space.”

“Europe?….. will be told to go f-k itself and not to come back until the job is finished.”

“I think it is clear to the army and clear to everyone. It will be a real bloodbath.”

These are just some quotes that were publicly stated by Karadzic in his quest for a “Greater Serbia” (draw your own conclusions with “Eretz Israel” – “Greater Israel” ), some as early as 1990, don’t think for one second that the international community didn’t know what they were dealing with.

Here was a Muslim population living in Europe for centuries, they were fully assimilated, they were of the whitest of white skin and had the bluest of blue eyes, the only difference?

The Muslims of former Yugoslavia testified to the fact that La’Illa’Ha’Il’Allah …. there is no “god” but Allah.

The outpouring of nationalist rhetoric in the background of a collapsing communist structure left a gaping chasm in the identity of Yugoslavia. In the rush for independence, Karadzic & Slobodan Milošević became the key architects (a modern day pairing of Hitler & Goering) of the jingoistic rhetoric that would soon turn to wholesale slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Muslims.

The trial in itself is irrelevant, will the mothers of those slaughtered in the concentration camps of Srebrenica ever have a semblance of peace?

45 years after Europe collectively declared that “Never Again” would we witness another holocaust, yet you had the same methodology of extermination being used.

This time aided and abetted by the UN. The Dutch, who were in control of Srebrenica, as a UN designated safe haven, stepped aside and allowed the Serbian forces straight in.

The only interesting information that may come out of the trial, is if Karadzic begins to point the finger back at the collusion between himself and the western world.

It wasn’t that long ago that Milosevic was on trial in the same Hague courtrooms, only to die under mysterious circumstances.

Was Milosevic about to implicate the leaders of the western world?

Regardless of the sentence handed out to Karadzic, I personally find no comfort in the system.

As he was being tried, Biljana Plavsic the “Serbian Iron Lady” who was sentenced to 11 years in jail in 2003, for her role in the Yugoslav civil war, was RELEASED after serving six years….on grounds of good behaviour.

This coming from a woman who openly declared that:

“Muslims are the genetic defect on the Serbian body”

Hajra Mulic, who lost her son in the Serbian killing spree, said:

“Plavsic is a disgrace and her release is a disgrace”

I couldn’t agree more.

Can you imagine a nazi war criminal, convicted at the Nuremberg trials, being released early for good behaviour.

This happens precisely because we, as Muslims in “The West”, refuse to play what I call “The Game”.

Instead we stand on the touchlines, with our grandstanding antics, debating in matters of absurdity, yes absurdity, when it is our blood that is flowing into the gutters as Muslims the world over live and die under oppressive regimes, because we in “The West” deem it “Haram” to engage in politics.

MP’s State Its “Unfair & Not Natural Justice” To Payback Expenses

The contempt for MP’s won’t go away until they have repaid all unreasonable expenses claimed.

Anne Widdecombe MP says the Legge inquiry (a whitewash in my opinion) is unfair and is not “natural justice”.

Does she really think that the performance of our MP’s, with regard to their opulent working conditions, their generous salaries, expenses, allowances, holidays, subsidised travel, food and drink…(do I need to continue?) over the last thirty years has been fair and just?

Perhaps they should be made to live on a minimum wage or a state pension.

Everyone of them knew beyond a reasonable doubt that the system so many abused would never have existed and could only survive whilst out of the public scrutiny.

And they ensured that the system was kept under wraps for as long as they could.

It’s precisely the greed and the connivance of these corrupt MP’s which has led to a deterioration in the public’s confidence of their elected representatives. This apathetic situation has led to the rise of right-wing nazi extremist elements like the BNP & the EDL gaining momentum for their causes.

Forget the technicalities.

Repay or resign.

Palestinian Land “Belongs To The Jews” Says Israeli Army Judge

How the izzies can claim to be the shining beacon of law and democracy in the Middle East is beyond a joke. They employ a man whose hatred for the indigenous population is so blatant it becomes laughable even trying to defend it.

This is a man who has to listen to the Palestinians appeal against being ethnically cleansed from their land.

Not one single Palestinian has successfully appealed their case of being evicted from their land in front of Agassi.

…and you honestly thought that the executioner would show his victims any mercy?

Yet more zionist schemes to forcibly remove the Palestinians and steal the land, all under the eyes of a watching international community, who are scared to act, in case they get hit with the anti-semitic stick.

Major Adrian Agassi is an Israeli army lawyer and military judge.

He is responsible of arguably the most significant battle in the occupied West Bank – the confiscation of Palestinian land for the construction of illegally built Jewish occupation zones – and has come to see himself as in service of a higher duty.

In an unusually frank interview with the Guardian, which offers insights into the melding of religion, politics and law that underpins land seizures in the occupied territories, Agassi has laid out his belief that Israel has a biblical claim to territory beyond its borders and that he, even as an immigrant, has a right to live on it when those born there do not.

“When we [Israelis] say that this is a political conflict, then we lose the battle,” he told the Guardian, adding that it should be remembered that the ancient land of Israel is “given to us by the Bible, not by some United Nations”.

Agassi, one of the most important officials in the military courts wielding authority over large parts of the West Bank, says settling Jews on lands that made up ancient Israel stands above all other biblical commandments and only when it is done can they have “a promised land and a promised life”.

“You say that these lands ‘passed into Jewish hands’. Others would say that they came back into Jewish hands. Others would say that they are obviously ours, inherently,” he said. It was, he claims, a mistake to call it the State of Israel. “If we would have named it the State of Jews, the Arabs would have understood that this land belongs to the Jews.”

Agassi served in the legal department that oversaw the confiscation of land in the West Bank to build Jewish settlements and was then appointed to the military court that decided Palestinian appeals against the seizure of their property. The Palestinians almost never won. His court also ruled on legal disputes between Jewish settlers and Palestinians.

Agassi denies his credo affected his legal judgments but his court was considered so biased by some critics that on one occasion the military prosecution, in an unusual step, appealed against Agassi’s ruling in favour of settlers to Israel’s high court.

Agassi says a peace agreement with the Palestinians “goes against nature” because as far as he can see nothing had changed in last 4,000 years in the land of Israel, and that back to biblical times Arabs and Jews were at each other’s throats.

Agassi uses the term Arabs because he claims Palestinians do not exist.

He came to this conclusion over the past decade while serving as a special judge for administrative arrest. Based on confidential intelligence reports, without trial, Agassi sent several hundred Palestinians – deemed to be terrorists or security threats – to prison for six months or more.

Thanks A Lot HT – Glen “Omar Hamza” Jenvey Confesses to Being A Fake Muslim

In an earlier post I outlined the plot being hatched by Glen Jenvey.

Guess what, my suspicions were confirmed with this video:

The MP he keeps referring to is Patrick Mercer MP, head of the counter-terrorism sub-committee, a person to whom Glen Jenvey has given dodgy intelligence to before.

In my original post I questioned HT’s (or whatever label they are masquerading under today – Islam4UK) logic in accepting a stooge like Jenvey into their ranks, if you remember the statement they put out, it went along the lines of we should accept him, what’s past is in the past….more fool you.

The reason for this nefarious act?

To prove (in a forthcoming book) that all Muslims whether they are MPACUK or HT (two groups who are more diametrically opposed in their strategical views and objectives you will not find) are all extremists and should be under the scrutiny of the intelligence agencies (05:30 into the video).

The guys in HT are part of the covert system being used to undermine Islam and Muslims in the UK, that I have no doubt about anymore, their planned “Trafalgar under shariah” march this weekend plays smack bang into the hands of the BNP, EDL and the adherents to the policy of the “Islamification” of Europe.

I’ve taken the liberty of copying and pasting from the excellent barthsnotes blog.

Back in January, it was shown that freelance ”terror expert” Glen Jenvey had been making bogus postings to Muslim web forums which he would then use as evidence of Muslim extremism to generate stories in tabloid newspapers. The initial evidence was discovered by Tim Ireland, and confirmed by an audio recording in which Jenvey admitted to using a particular on-line alias. That audio recording was passed to Tim and me by Dominic Wightman for his own purposes; he told us that it had been made by Charlie Flowers, of a music group known as the Fighting Cocks (I’ve blogged on both these characters here and here).

Tim’s discovery led to reports in the Guardian and Private Eye (in the latter case without acknowledging Tim’s work), and in May doubts about Jenvey were mentioned in passing in a Daily Mail article about anti-Muslim protests in Luton. Jenvey was greatly offended and upset by this Mail piece – he made a video threatening to kill himself outside the newspaper’s offices, and shortly afterwards he announced his conversion to Islam and a new association with the Islamic extremists around Anjem Choudary. His new Islamic identity was remarkably crude, and he railed bitterly against Jews and Israelis. He explained that he had created a story about British Jews being targeted by Muslim extremists in revenge for military action in Gaza (the story which brought him to Tim’s attention) because he wanted British Jews to share the fear felt by Palestinians; this was a somewhat problematic explanation, as this was several months before his conversion to Islam and he was on record as being very pro-Israeli.

And now – not entirely unexpectedly – he’s switched back again. In a video which he posted to Liveleak and then pulled (but which can still be seen in Google cache), he explains that the whole business was an exercise in infiltration, as a result of which he now knows more about Muslim extremists in Wiltshire and Hampshire, the area of the UK in which he lives (although he also met lots of moderates). He also claims he had to undertake this subterfuge because the security services are “clueless” and “institutionally racist”.

He kisses a crucifix, mentions the fact that he is gay, and tells us that during his undercover period he would read the Koran while drinking beer and speak to Omar Bakri on the phone while eating a bacon sandwich and drinking wine. He also says he has been working for “an MP and a diplomat” – presumably a reference to Patrick Mercer MP, who has lately been keen to distance himself from his past association with Jenvey. We’re promised more information when he has written his book.

This is not the first time Jenvey has done this: a few years ago he ran a pro-Jihadi website to generate interest from Islamic extremists, which he then replaced with the message that “Jehad is crap” followed by an attack on the national identity of Palestinians.

More Zionist Hatred – This Time Against A Flag

This Israeli occupation terrorist is threatened by the mere sight of a Palestinian flag.

He is trying to kick it down.

How many flags do you have to kick to extinguish the flame of Palestinian struggle for liberation?

It is futile: go home – your home, and not Palestinian homes.

Nazi Nick Gets His Backside Handed To Him!

Nazi Nick Griffin had his proverbial backside handed to him on a silver platter on last night’s Question Time.

The Akh was pleased to see that not one of the panellists gave up an inch of ground when exposing Griffin for the vile, racist that he is. Even Sayeeda Warsi, of whom I’m no fan of (what was up with the huge poppy?) came up trumps.

He did try and throw the “We support Israel against Hamas” when asked about being a holocaust denier, thankfully no one bought that.

Interestingly the BNP website was down this morning, with a note stating “We have had to take our normal website offline”.

Wouldn’t it be nice if Nazi Nick and his adherents would all just go “offline” and let the decent people of Britain live together with some semblance of peace and unity.

If you missed it, you can watch here on the iplayer.

All I’m going to do is run through the press briefings and I’m glad to announce, that the British Media have come out unanimously in rightfully condemning the BNP for their abhorrent and repugnant ideological views.

The Times carries a half-page photograph of anti-fascist campaigners protesting outside BBC Television Centre before the show was recorded.

For that paper, Libby Purves writes of host David Dimbleby “only occasionally was it apparent that his flesh was creeping”; Matthew Parris remarks that “nobody dared try what, if it could have been done, would have been the most devastating tactic of all […]: to brush him aside as a small man, enlarged by the anger of his enemies”, and David Aaronovitch concludes :

he confided that he thought the BBC to be ‘part of a thoroughly unpleasant ultra-leftist establishment’, when voters know it best for Strictly Come Dancing. He showed himself to be, not so much a fearful Nazi, as kook.

The Guardian focuses on Mr Griffin’s denials with the headline “As protesters bay outside BBC, Griffin insists ‘I am not a Nazi'”. In an editorial column, the paper portrays the BBC as:

a ratings-hungry corporation [which] failed to defend the values embodied in its own equality policies; it confused ultra-relativism with a proper commitment to free speech.

The Daily Mail headlines its report “Bigot at Bay”.

“Jeered, scorned and ridiculed… but still BNP leader milks his moment in the spotlight,” the Mail says.

The paper says the “priceless air time” has left the BBC facing accusations of “publicity-seeking naivety” and Max Hastings regrets that “[a]s a history lesson, almost all the panel talked tosh.”

The Independent reports on the demonstrations under the headline “Griffin’s baptism of fire at the BBC”.

It says the BNP leader had to be smuggled in through a back door. Tom Sutcliffe reflects:

Was it an early Christmas present for the BNP, an audience member asked finally, as Peter Hain had charged? If it was it was one of those presents that requires you to adopt a fixed and unconvincing grin, and which falls apart in your hands even as the wrapping is coming off.

The Daily Telegraph has a photo of Mr Griffin surrounded by his minders as he arrived at the BBC.

It says the corporation was “under siege” after the BNP leader used his appearance to attack Muslims and homosexuals while defending the Ku Klux Klan.

It says the “controversial statements” were made in response to “intense questioning” by audience members from ethnic minorities.

The Scum carries the headline “When Auntie Met Nazi” and says Mr Griffin “outraged the Question Time audience”.

“Booed Nick Griffin smugly” joined the panel after the BNP leader sparked mayhem at TV Centre, it reports. The paper’s deputy political editor Graeme Wilson writes : “Shifty and ridiculous, the BNP leader crumbled before our eyes.”

The Daily Express describes the appearance as a “dangerous and shameful moment” for British democracy, its editorial claiming :

Griffin has learnt plenty since his days as a National Front boot boy. He has coated himself with a fake veneer of respectability, becoming the purveyor of a sharp-suited, soft-focus form of fascism.

The Daily Mirror says Mr Griffin “slunk away” from the BBC after a “pitiful display” which exposed him as a political lightweight.

But in its leader column, it says “free speech should not include the right to spread hatred on national TV”. Political editor Kevin Maguire adds :

The logic of Thompson’s argument is Griffin will be invited on other programmes which feature other politicians. Putting Griffin on Question Time inflates his position. Last night the BNPer was deflated. Let’s leave it at that.

Let Battle Commence – BNP On Question Time

Yeah I Said It! makes a very timely point, concerning the appearance of “Chairman Nick” on tonight’s Question Time.

This whole saga has split public opinion right down the middle, on one hand you have those who cannot see beyond “free speech” (what even if it is bordering on incitement of racial hatred?) but we’re constantly told that we have to allow them a platform to air their views, no matter how abhorrent they are.

A strange decision by a public funded broadcaster.

On the flipside we have those who totally and rightly, oppose the racist, nazi views that the BNP are promoting.

We see through the hypocrisy of the whole situation.

Muslims are constantly beaten with the extremist stick – it seems we are the only ones who should be challenged on our views – but when extremists like Griffin & Geert Wilders are welcomed into our institutions to air their prejudiced views, the furore is far tamer.

I’m sure I’ll be tuning in to the ding-dong tonight, let’s just hope the “distinguished” panel have the balls to go hard at Griffin, anything less will be a travesty.

On a sidenote, I applied to be part of the Question Time audience, guess the BBC had met their quota of outspoken Muslims on this occasion.

Racist Recruitment Policies in the UK

We live in a multi-racial, multi-ethnic society, where gender, colour, creed and class are no longer barriers to our social mobility, right?

Wrong.

The majority of people from ethnic minorities are worse off in terms of employment now than they were two decades ago.

So who is more likely to be called up for an interview, based solely on their name?

Nazia Mahmood
Mariam Namagembe
Alison Taylor

These three names are recognisably from three different communities.

Researchers using false identities were created with similar experiences and qualifications, had a British education and similar work histories.

Yet after sending 3,000 job applications, it was found that Alison who appeared to be white would send nine applications before receiving a positive response of either an invitation to an interview or an encouraging telephone call.

Nazia & Mariam with the same qualifications and experience had to send 16 applications before receiving a similar response.

You can read the full findings here – Undercover job hunters reveal huge race bias in Britain’s workplaces.

This takes the Akh back to a time when he was a fresh graduate, armed with a shining new degree, ready to take on all comers in industry.

I couldn’t list the sheer amount of jobs and career paths I applied for in the last six months of university and the year after leaving.

I did eventually get into what I wanted, but the truth is the amount of knock-backs I took, could, to a lesser man, have been utterly soul shattering.

It was interesting to note that I was never interviewed once by anyone with a hint of melanin in their skin tone and that is pretty much reflected within the make-up of the vast majority of senior management and at board level in industry.

US & UK Training Jondollah & MEK for Bombing/Subversion Campaign’s Inside Iran

The BBC reported on the assassination of several top commanders in Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards, supposedly in a suicide bombing.

What the report fails to mention that this is an escalation of a long and concerted plan by western powers to undermine & overthrow the leadership of Iran. They tried with the failed attempt of a coup d’état with claims of vote rigging against the Ahmadinejinad government.

When the doves fail to do their jobs, its time to send in the jackals.

Since 2007 Iran have been pointing the finger at the US & UK for supporting terrorist organisations within Iran.

A report on the American news network ABC makes it clearer to understand.

Pakistani government sources say the secret campaign against Iran by Jundullah was on the agenda when Vice President Dick Cheney met with Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf in February.

A senior U.S. government official said groups such as Jundullah have been helpful in tracking al Qaeda figures and that it was appropriate for the U.S. to deal with such groups in that context.

Some former CIA officers say the arrangement is reminiscent of how the U.S. government used proxy armies to destabilize the government of Nicaragua in the 1980s.

These are the “new contra’s” that the americans are using to assassinate the leadership of the revolutionary guard in Iran.

The American administration’s policy of “my enemy’s enemy is my friend” has led the US to support the Baluchi organisation Jondollah and the MEK (Mujahideen-e-Khalq a.k.a PMOI), both of which have clear track records of terrorist activities.

Veteran investigative reporter, Seymour Hersh has covered this subject in great depth.

He states that the US has been giving arms and cash to the terrorists in the MEK for years and “most of the [MEK] leaders have been taking our money and cashing it in an awful lot of bank accounts in London.”

He also reveals for the first time that the US has trained MEK teams in the state of Nevada and that “they do a lot of crazy stuff inside Iran”.

“Teams of hunter-killers are based in Afghanistan and are launching attacks into Iran against high value targets”

This is defined as “defensive lethal activity”

Next time Iran is mentioned in the news, look at it subjectively and realise the game that is being played to cause internal ructions within the country.

The mainstream media will not cover this angle.